Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?

To:	xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?
From:	Rob Beglinger <rbeglinger@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:25:13 -0600
Delivery-date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:26:06 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Rjj3atY0ocZIo0etVbBkvogeHYJdM5GqAdIa8Oa0B/8=; b=R+Q+rsYA/ie3wqBtAXtMBEx1olpIibaQJ20A3OvkZJRlYjIuMT15dYEyS+1Fm4AM5W 7PNI6Kb0HUSltW77sRpkiRanb42Of/jabvTGT7WasCNeqHYU8Nn0MnN64Nt1irAb71VQ W0NciKBSxq82e/6svhDNKd0Ayz/fhCqRDSAQU=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IpQ76rppM0H9Dmwt4WKPINrs6zvacU8vR62MxTh+ZLme7EWGyA9UcuxQTuo9rX+uE7 LF9+i3QAvuS7cgPB4H7xRskMbSi7fIYtHS7MQ0zS25i6YOYZVK1sFRTab263O5uzmoxJ IqtuE4kc141mH2rV+8wRS9B9orPIHq/Xj7pnQ=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<2009121122015.259750@leena>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<4976DBF5.87A6.0099.1@xxxxxxxxx> <2009121122015.259750@leena>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Something like this?

http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Open_Topics_For_Discussion?action="">

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:20 PM, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> FWIW, I've had much better success with OCFS2's fencing methods than with
> GFS.� My OCFS2 nodes, when they lose connectivity to the rest of the

I've looked at ZFS and sure love the sounds of that. Not sure if they have an open source version, I thought I did see one though. When I was reading up on it, it sounded a lot simpler and had a lot of additional features.

> Also, I'd say the overall point is that there's no "magic bullet" that's
> going to knock out all of your redundancy concerns at the same time.� Xen

Right, I've picked that up based on the replies :). I can still fantasize though, of a cluster of virtual servers running OS's which are totally redundant. What a perfect world that will be! And I'm SURE it's only a matter of time.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] Appliances, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?