WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] RE: Xen 3 Bonding VLAN issue

To: Thomas Menard <TMenard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] RE: Xen 3 Bonding VLAN issue
From: Muhammad Atif <m_atif_s@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:45:25 -0800 (PST)
Cc:
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:46:27 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=M6p1nzIPKVgxxrqA8Vkrd2Td/wU2sR3oeGUQyew24GGTyh7R5JMyuzXK2QOZR5uDFcFyYEHCoIn0wIPvLTIhpa2K67VRwZdmAjy2g+mgf0fsYgnM+/Lly0o5+J9K4ThUt9YSMJBU2y7WNdsCHGLBfDW61UNJ42mADEJn3+PSb2c=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1C02E5142522A48862852F89EAA164F04DFAA029E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1C02E5142522A48862852F89EAA164F04DFAA0571@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You figure is not  that clear to me. From what I see is that you are trying to bond (call it bond0) eth0 and eth1 at dom0. And then you create a xenbr with bond0. On domU you wish to create another bond using eth0 and eth1.  From what I see from your figure you are providing domU with eth0 and eth1 from same XenBr????

I am not the best of the judges as your case can be different, but this arrangement is kinda dodgey. You will not see any gain in bandwidth or fault tolerance in domU.  If fault tolerance is what you are after, providing domU with only one NIC (eth0) is sufficient with your arrangement. If thats the bandwidth you are after then good luck, because I am yet to see anyone actually benefitting from link aggregation for domU using similar mechanism. (that includes me as well).


 
Best Regards,
Muhammad Atif



From: Thomas Menard <TMenard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 11:05:52 PM
Subject: [Xen-users] RE: Xen 3 Bonding VLAN issue

Hi

Nobody to help me please ?

 

I’m totally stuck and I don’t find any help on my problem.

 

De : xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Thomas Menard
Envoyé : mercredi 7 janvier 2009 15:42
À : xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : [Xen-users] Xen 3 Bonding VLAN issue

 

Hi

I’m working on the implementation on XEN in my company, I’ve got a strange issue.

 

I’ve installed a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 Xen server on a Dell PowerEdge 1955 Server.

 

We use automated installation trough home made scripts (more than 150 servers and keep growing fast), we use this architecture :

 

 

dom0                                                                                  domU

Eth0--------------

                               |             |------xenbr0-------------------eth0------

                               |             |                                             |                             |

                               |             |                                             |                             |-----bond0----bond0.11

                               |-----bond0---bond0.11               |-----eth1-------|             |--------bond0.120

                               |             |------bond0.120

Eth1--------------

 

We try to do the same on domU on PE 1955 but only the native VLAN (bond0) can go trough.

 

We use 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen kernel  with Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) nic cards.

 

I’ve saw on the internet that this may be an issue with the driver included with the kernel, I’ve rebuilt the driver picked from Broadcom site and it still the same issue.

 

If anyone can help me with that thx

 

Thomas


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>