This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-users] HVM Cpu performance 3.2

To: "Oliver Wilcock" <oliver@xxxxxxx>, <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] HVM Cpu performance 3.2
From: "Ian Tobin" <itobin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:31:27 -0000
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:32:50 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20081209122103.64343B025435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3803.>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclaAXO//F0JpyMKTT6LHcInA9bpHwAAM0gg
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] HVM Cpu performance 3.2
Yes thats correct.

The windows dom Us are using between 30-80% usage in xm top and the host
itself is running slow.

Ill have a look at your recommend searches

Thanks for your help


-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oliver
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:24
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] HVM Cpu performance 3.2

> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:15:13 -0000
> From: "Ian Tobin" <itobin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Xen-users] HVM Cpu performance 3.2
> Hi,
> It seems after upgrading to this release the cpu consumption has
> increased quite considerably.
> The server is an AMD 2.6 Dual Core.
> If you set the HVM config to use 1 vcpu instead of 2 the performance
> increases a lot which is quite strange.
> Anyone else had this problem? It was working fine on 3.0.4
> Thanks
> Ian

Do you mean that a Windows HVM consumes a lot of CPU according to xm
If so you may have my problem - search for ACPI APIC and Windows HAL
issues in relation to performance of Windows HVM.

I haven't use Xen earlier than 3.2 (SLES10 sp2) so I can't comment on an
increase or comparison to Xen 3.0.2.

Xen-users mailing list

Xen-users mailing list