WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance

To: "'Stefan de Konink'" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Thomas Halinka'" <lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
From: "Venefax" <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:36:05 -0500
Cc: 'Xen Users' <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 'Guillaume' <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:38:16 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=HCbUJ95cmlPZbt7GmTTp2K5UEMl91ao4DIq9WyD9d0I=; b=nvF0vgeV4fSwyz40Fp8B1AM5Jg3bxUKxkMtMRiz0f+dR+kuskK8iXoSO+6Wn4JgkOE SFdJq84mew1YyfMoo7XILp9WOREE5QEmNhNftTNnzaOHVs40l4Bn5FbWCsqGIL2qs8L4 ZVx70qaCpbrlTbxJdEs3AeTp0QzjPe5mdZpYY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=Jzqg7AQuLdX2sHgaGxVwJ7julBGlRq937Bni8Psj9iuCt5qluwhMzoCViKHds77AUu Cbu8PxL4nkpWhTyc8tjcy75zq+E+V8n0Yc/BUmkVSYuPo9m2PkVaBMR02Rxvgq3PateZ xrI23+l0G6c3OMaQg9pJUQStw7HNK2I1M5Zao=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081128161831.H27234-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1227885339.25974.34.camel@ubu32> <20081128161831.H27234-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclRbUBeC6G0gjPLSW+nMYQPyYhktAAAaAHA
I would like a step by step description of how to install AOE support
between two Xen servers, in my case SUSE SP2. It seems like the ideal
protocol for storage.
Yours
Federico

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stefan de Konink
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 10:23 AM
To: Thomas Halinka
Cc: Guillaume; Xen Users; Stefan de Konink
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance

On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:

> i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a
> GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage!

My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links
10GE ->  1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance.

> Why is FC faster than iSCSI? Ah, it s because of the protocol.

Non-sence.

> >  and preferably stability comparisons.
>
> open-iscsi has no stable releases yet. aoetools do have. There are also
> many users complaining about iscsi-kernel-issues....

...there is more than open-iscsi, in targets and initiators. (+ OS'es)


Stefan


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users