Geoffrey wrote:
> Todd Deshane wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Geoffrey <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >> Is this a reasonable expectation with virtualization?
> >
> > This doesn't seem quite right to me, try kernbench and
> > also make sure the versions of xen and guest kernels
> > are the same on the server and laptop for a good
> > comparision.
>
> I'm not running xen on the laptop. Laptop is RHEL 5.2,
> kernel: 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5
>
> > The overhead of Xen PV should be pretty low vs native.
>
> I was wrong when I said we were para-virtualizing, this is full
> virtualization.
Well, why not put up the xen config for the domU and see if
anybody can suggest some tweaks, but if you are using RH + Xen
it would be silly NOT to para-virtualize it.
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home