WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Network receive performance of Xen

To: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Network receive performance of Xen
From: "Sahan Gamage" <sahans@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:30:04 -0400
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:31:33 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=EAH69zMS1fYafv96Nf4h5toVOA8NFiEnkqPhyRcoIW4=; b=PvLNFJjLvxtOJXCvcx2BbKVVg+vkrBxqU4Aabtg4ggVPwHXn3lilLNq+rzTGcMzRd5 sqdzvbBPJHl7y5wapJ2OVgynOsTuMNfScS+LO+YomHDzA5qSThUnWyOUUI1+Laas3y79 NLJiEByGisr+xVQ+PvZj7sTrzcwzhrYjH/JBU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=C/KGxNPjV4ENnS4xvds8vwq4vd6qAs0beJq7Sr/7p4EKO/yiNSUvgPTXuWsNItDcap qwOOyr20fGNBWUEi04B7KjMd6TC2IBXSarMYa6ClW22CmgFq1KbaN3F35gCmL+nocCyc EynkPZtAqpzwvFvr4FtcxKL9j7FnRtui813RA=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi All,

I am doing some experiments on network performance of Xen in
uniprocessor environment. I use both iperf and netperf to measure the
TCP transmit and receive performance of domU and I see some strange
asymmetric behavior. The other end of the TCP pipe in these scenarios
is a non-virtualized machine.  For transmit I can see about 900 Mbps
and for receive performance I can only see around 400 Mbps.
I searched the web and mailing lists regarding this issue. A
presentation I found [1] suggests I should see equal performance for
both Tx and Rx. But there are some questions in the mailing lists
which suggests otherwise [2], [3]

My machine setup is :
Processor : Intel P4 at 3Ghz (HT disabled)
Mem : 2GB
Dom0 and DomU OS : Debian Etch (Linux kernel 2.6.18-6 with Xen pathces)
Xen version: 3.0.3

Has anyone experienced same problem ? Is this a result of misconfiguration ?

Thanks in advance
-sahan

[1] http://xen.org/files/xensummit_fall07/16_JoseRenatoSantos.pdf
[2] http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2007-06/msg00004.html
[3] http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-04/msg00096.html

P.S: I tried most of the workarounds (changing the scheduler to EDF,
assigning priorities, changing txqueuelen on vifx.x)

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>