WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] question about hvmloader and "No PCI config space access fun

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] question about hvmloader and "No PCI config space access function found"
From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:47:36 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:48:38 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is the error message "No PCI config space access function found" connected 
to hvmloader enabled hypervisor kernels?

I started to get this message in VMs yesterday. Yesterday I compiled 3.2.1 
according to the instructions at 
http://grantmcwilliams.com/index.php?
option=com_content&view=article&id=204:recompile-xen-321-for-centos-
5&catid=97:xen-howtos&Itemid=379

I started to get this message yesterday, but *not* after installing the 
new rpms, but already before it. I only noticed it today. It's possible 
that there is some time glitch that makes it appear as having already 
happened before. The sure thing is it started yesterday.

So, I wonder if this has anything to do with hvm. Per the instructions at 
the grantmcwilliams site I uncommented the "# /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" 
line from that spec file. I first compiled with it commented and then 
uncommented and ran both hypervisors. Is it correct to assume that I only 
need that line if I want to run fully virtualized guests? (I do not want 
to.) Or does it have other functionality as well? I just uncommented and 
compiled with it, because I was troubleshooting the freqency scaling 
problem and wanted to see if it makes a difference. As I installed this 
after the first test without hvmloader I'm now running with it.

So, basic question: is the error message harmless or even expected if I 
run paravirtualized guests? Is there any advantage or disadvantage 
compiling with hvmloader if I do not run fully virtualized guests?


Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com




_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-users] question about hvmloader and "No PCI config space access function found", Kai Schaetzl <=