WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] unable to access Linux HVM via xm console - Couldnotread

To: "Rudi Ahlers" <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] unable to access Linux HVM via xm console - Couldnotread tty from store: No such file or directory
From: "Nick Couchman" <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:08:32 -0600
Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Itamar - IspBrasil <itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:09:29 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48573B70.9030304@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4856BDA4.87A6.0099.1@xxxxxxxxx> <48573B70.9030304@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, HVM - a hardware virtual machine - is the way to run unmodified guest O/Ss on Xen.  If your O/S has a modified kernel available, though, you should use that.  CentOS 5.1 definitely has a PV (modified) kernel available, so is there some reason you want to run your CentOS 5.1 domU in an HVM (unmodified), or maybe you should switch over to the modified kernel for that domU?

>>> On 2008/06/16 at 22:20, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nick Couchman wrote:
> HVM = fully virtualized.  The question is, why are you using fully
> virtualized domUs?  Why not paravirtualized (PV)?
>
> >>> On 2008/06/16 at 16:07, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Itamar - IspBrasil wrote:
> > why you're using hvm ? its slow
> >
> >
> >
> > Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I'm running CentOS 5.1 x64 + Xen 3.0 & I have setup a CentOS 5.1 x64
> >> domU as a HMV. For the setup I used VNC, but I would prefer to be
> >> able to access it via "xm console cPanel" via SSH directly.
> >>
> >> Here's the output cPanel HVM:
> >>
> >> [root@pc-00059 ~]# more /etc/xen/cPanel
> >> name = "cPanel"
> >> uuid = "ff940501-507d-04ca-e590-831e79ba0397"
> >> maxmem = 6144
> >> memory = 6144
> >> vcpus = 2
> >> builder = "hvm"
> >> kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader"
> >> boot = "c"
> >> pae = 1
> >> acpi = 0
> >> apic = 0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> device_model = "/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm"
> >> sdl = 0
> >> vnc = 0
> >> vncunused = 2
> >> #disk = [
> >>
> "phy:/dev/data/cPanel,hda,w","file:/data/storage/CentOS-5.1-x86_64-bin-1of7.iso,ioemu:hdc:cdrom,r"
>
> >> ]
> >> disk = [ "phy:/dev/data/cPanel,hda,w" ]
> >> vif = [ "mac=00:16:3e:4e:9b:48,bridge=xenbr0,type=ioemu" ]
> >> serial = "pty"
> >> usb = 1
> >> usbdevice = 'tablet'
> >>
> >>
> >> When I try and connect to it via console, I get the following:
> >> [root@pc-00059 ~]# xm console cPanel
> >> xenconsole: Could not read tty from store: No such file or directory
> >> [root@pc-00059 ~]#
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Reading through all the email archives, I found a few similar
> >> problems, but the suggested fixes doesn't help. Does anyone know how
> >> to get xm console to work for HVM type domU's ?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> mmm, now that I think of it. I setup fully virtualized hosts, not HVM -
> my bad.....
>
> --
>

ok, so I had the right words :)

as far as I understand, HVM is the only way to get Windows, or rather
unmodified OS',  installed onto Linux, right? Or is there another way? I
setup Windows like this, and simply copied the Windows HMV
(/etc/xen/windows2003) to a new one for Linux (/etc/xen/cPanel) and
installed Linux onto it.

Should I rather have used a non-virtualized (is this referred to as
paravirtualized ?) installation? But would I then be able to install say
Ubuntu onto CentOS as a PV? Doesn't Ubuntu use a different kernel than
the Red Hat family (Red Hat, Fedora Core, CentOS)?

--

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
CEO, SoftDux

Web:   http://www.SoftDux.com
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff


This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users