WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] A simple backup

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] A simple backup
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 08:36:22 +0700
Cc: Steve Spencer <sspencer@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 May 2008 18:36:59 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200805082005.47735.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <48221AEF.50009@xxxxxxxx> <48222125.4030405@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200805082005.47735.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227)
Mark Williamson wrote:
When you take an atomic snapshot of a domU's state, it's much the same kind of backup image as you'd get by yanking the power from a server, removing its hard drive and copying it byte-for-byte - often readable but definitely not clean. That consistency problem is what makes it impossible to guarantee that such backups are definitely readable.

Hi Mark,

Some thoughts about your comment.
In our environment, one of the requirements for the OS and applications is that it must be able to recover quickly and cleanly from a power failure. This is actually one of the reasons why we're starting to migrate some stuff to zfs : because, when used properly, it always guarantee filesystem consistency in the event of power failure.

IMHO, even the best commercial SAN-based backup solution uses that assumption, so for practical purposes, atomic backup for domU's storage should be sufficient.

It would be nicer if you could somehow guarantee a consistent filesystem state on your disk snapshot. I've been looking into how to do this and I believe it's quite possible to modify the code to support this properly.


It would be interesting if you can make it happen.

Regards,

Fajar

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>