| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] CentOS 5.1 Xen 3.2 patches
Bas Mevissen wrote:
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, just found out that libvirt.i386 is (no longer?) a dependancy for
> >> something I have installed. OK, so now it is purely academic :-)
> >
> > Yes, I removed the silly artificial dependency with libvirt that
> > RH created, because 3.2 no longer needs libvirt to properly function.
> >
>
> Something else (forgot what) was depending on libvirt.i386. So now I
> could already remove it without breaking something.
>
> > Are you trying to run a 32-bit dom0 with a 64-bit hypervisor?
>
> No. All 64-bit until now.
Oh, OK, I misunderstood. I guess the i386 libvirt was brought in
because of another 32-bit app.
> > You're doing it the "poor-man's method" where you run a 64-bit Xen,
> > 64-bit dom0 and 32-bit userland aren't you?
>
> Is is an x86_64 CentOS 5.1 install which also has some i386 stuff
> installed (by the installer). So the majority of the userland
> is 64-bit.
>
> >> Hmmm, A CentOS i386 DomU on a x86_64 system. Does that work nowadays?
> >
> > It does with 3.2.
>
> Great! Will give it a try.
Well let the list know how it works for you.
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home