| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.2 & CentOS
Vinod Kumar wrote:
On 2/27/08, *Nico Kadel-Garcia* <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
John Morris wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Can't you install rhe Xensource.com <http://Xensource.com>
RPM's as upgrades to the
>> Centos/RHEL RPM's? I've certainly done so with CentOS and RHEL, 4.x
>> and 5.x. There are some subtle differences between them, and I
>> haven't tried the 3.2 RPM's myself.
> Can you point me to those? The xen.org <http://xen.org> RPMs at
> http://xen.org/download/dl_32rhel5.html don't include 64-bit
versions,
> and going to xensource.com <http://xensource.com>, I get lost in
a maze of marketing.
>
> John
>
Looks like you need to recompile from the SRPM. Do you have a 64-bit
system to do it on?
I was looking for xen 3.2 64bit for the similar reason (32 bit domU
crashes on 64bit dom0).I tried to build the source rpm of xen 3.2
(downloaded from
http://bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/3.2.0/centos-5.1/xen-3.2.0-0xs.centos5.src.rpm) using
rpmbuild on a CentOS 5.1(x86_64), and I got the below error:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader
Please let me know the changes required for building the src.rpm on 64
bit system?
I was curious to know about the existing installation and I found that
the package xen-3.0.3-41.el5-x86_64, installs all the binaries and
libs in /usr/lib64/xen, but puts the hvmloader in /usr/lib/xen!
Thanks,
Vinod
Huh. Interesting. RedHat's SRPM's are a bit more sophisticated than
those for Xensource, traditionally, so I'm not shocked you found a
discrepancy building it for x86_64. Perhaps you can review the
differences in the .spec files and see how RedHat did it?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home