WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Choosing O/S for dom0 host with xen 3.2 - best optio

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Choosing O/S for dom0 host with xen 3.2 - best option?
From: "--[ UxBoD ]--" <uxbod@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:18:14 +0000 (GMT)
Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:18:55 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802041401450.8343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: uxbod@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
if you have installed the libvirt stuff can you install the xensource-compiled 
tarballs over the top ? i see from the xen website though they only do i386 
versions :(

Regards,

-- 
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----- "Steven Timm" <timm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Centos 5.1 is dependent on their Upstream Vendor (the big vendor with
> the red hat) for whatever Xen or kernels they did. According to
> what I can find in those release nodes, they did their usual pattern
> of trying to shoehorn most but not all of the xen 3.1 patches
> into the distro and still call it xen 3.0.3.  The one notable
> difference between this and the real xen 3.1 that I've found so
> far is that according to the release notes, 32-bit PAE domU
> on 64-bit dom0 is a "technology preview" --not supported feature
> and I can testify that it doesn't work if you want to do any sort of
> I/O at all.  I went back to the xensource-compiled tarballs.
> 
> Steve Timm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, xensource.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users