WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] xen + centos + areca raid issues

To: Anand Gupta <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xen + centos + areca raid issues
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:59:46 +0000
Cc: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:59:17 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IMt7N5vQtrEBN0MsdePN1MPbuNoTPUQ0v0XhDinji0s=; b=LD141wQrN2mkZPLsBEJ3nxAdbKbYefU2CbLcKJqepECrcXqIbNccgnrMyQH+qeq8VEbIIZ1XE+Dyxf6LkG1GHwM6pQux8yYFpjpfPJ2Gbz8ijvPMSyL13zdzgD3GIOZOY0xITukk815qFmvA4in442w5FaredEqXt6gCp7jeJi8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PNcgV9BmR8VTX3bzgYrVI7HE8xA6moQJZncZO2DneMOoZmR30oP0YSxKv0mBM/oDP7GJkp7US3WNqtdyDP3zXKB7ipwdTXGJZ0VewSXXwyA2m2J0XSAOibMaLwh58sEM42RqniXPwV7qTaBeWtDdT/tSGw7s7d3aWShf6dCPpds=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <acb757c00710290303i654f7c6enab95422f9f40e234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <acb757c00710160437u233e3de3mb9e31717a3d94142@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200710162042.50367.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071016194546.GI30866@xxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00710180328j357a25das31d45c24ad4dc84b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00710280328u24ae85f4ve391df977c739195@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071028145619.GB9443@xxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00710290303i654f7c6enab95422f9f40e234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809)
Anand Gupta wrote:
On 10/28/07, *Daniel P. Berrange* <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    They're not required, because they're not required. That combo of
    lines
    happens to setup the guest in text mode with a serial console, but
    that's
    just one of many ways of configuring a guest. Certain badly
    behaved guest
    OS require a specific combo of options, but most don't care at all.


How can you say the guest is badly setup ? I used virt-manager to install a fresh centos5 pv domain using file based image, gave it the installation CD to use. It installed perfectly fine and was working also fine. Unless virt-manager itself creates a badly behaved guest ?

And then once i remove centos5 xen packages, virt-manager, compile xen 3.1.1, the image stopped booting. Once i add those lines, it starts to work again.

wondering...
Switching from a compiled configuration for *one* version of Xen, namely 3.0.x for CentOS 5, to another verson of Xen, namely 3.1.1, is sort of asking for backwards compatibility trouble.

I'm afraid such problems are likely to recur with hand-implemented Xen migrations to more recent releases, at least until RedHat has decided to update to it. And that's unlikely for RHEL 5: the stability of such OS version sis a big selling point for RedHat.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users