WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] domU kernel

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] domU kernel
From: "IDAGroup - R.W.Muller" <robin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:49:19 -0400
Delivery-date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:50:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4712B182.6050002@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <470EF48A.5070601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20071012045437.GA25878@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4712B182.6050002@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Wow, if that is true then is CentOS making a big mistake.
When I installed CentOS with virtualization and started virt-install according to there howto, I was guided to install another CentOS  domU but never asked to have a kernel outside the domU.

So, I just even realized that this  is possible, when I was reading this user list, before I thought the CentOS way is the only possibility ...so clearly: kernel IN domU

Steve Wray wrote:
Christian Horn wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:14:02AM -0400, IDAGroup - R.W.Muller wrote:
Hi, I found lots of threads where people talk about domU kernel sitting in /boot of dom0.
The only kernel I can see there is the one the machine and dom0 booted from (vmlinuz-2.6.18-8.el5xen)

Two places are common:
- domU-kernel placed on dom0-filesystem directly, 'kernel' option in xen-
  config for the domU is used then. Only possible for paravirt-domU.
  pros: - kernel is directly reachable from dom0
  cons: - domU depends on files outside of its disc-image, so you have to           keep an eye of what domU uses what kernel-file
        - on upgrading the domU-kernel is a bit more complicated, keep
          kernel, maybe existing initrd and modules-directory in sync

- domU-kernel placed inside the domU-diskimage. Works for both HVM and
  paravirt-domU. One sees mostly this nowadays. Kernel is located/booted
  by pygrub (or a script mounting the partition, making a copy of the
  kernel inside to dom0, and starting it then)
  pros: - easy updating, i.e. just 'yum update' from the domU updates the
          kernel, initrd, modules and kernel is booted on next domU-boot


You forgot the con.

cons: Security. You now have a domU in which a local exploit could result in code being executed in dom0 at the next boot of that domU. By the way, this actually happened. See CVE-2007-4993

IMHO putting the kernel in domU and using pygrub was always asking for trouble.

In my opinion it is completely crazy to expose dom0 to potential exploits from domU.

So far as I am aware this is the *only* way to so expose dom0 to domU security holes and I am deeply shocked if it is true that "One sees mostly this nowadays"



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>