| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] How to tell which tapX interface belongs to which domain
Err... sorry... I hit reply to the wrong email :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Harper
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2007 12:13
> To: James Harper; Christian Horn
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] How to tell which tapX interface belongs to
which
> domain...
>
> 212-798
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Harper
> > Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2007 12:00
> > To: 'Christian Horn'
> > Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] How to tell which tapX interface belongs to
> which
> > domain...
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:36:39PM +1000, James Harper wrote:
> > > > I've put together a script to get the traffic counters for a
given
> vm
> > > > interface (eg "vmif_traffic <domain> <if index>") and it works
great
> > > > except when the interface backend is ioemu, because all the
traffic
> > goes
> > > > through the tapX interface instead of the vif interface.
> > >
> > > I'm just doing the same, and besides not getting i/o yet i also
miss
> the
> > > number of tap-interfaces, would fit into 'xm list -l <domain>'
output.
> > > An idea to get the mapping could be to have a look on what tap-
> > interfaces
> > > are in use bevore domain-creation and after, the interfaces in use
now
> > > are the ones belonging to the domain.
> > >
> > > Had a look at the filehandles that are open for /dev/net/tun and
the
> > > qemu-dm processed, and at the logfiles, without better hints.
> >
> > I noticed that when I do a 'brctl show', the tap interface is on the
> line
> > before the vif interface, so I made use of that. Hopefully it's
always
> > true!
> >
> > James
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home