WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: XEN and Windows Guests in critical environment(hospi

To: Ligesh <myself@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: XEN and Windows Guests in critical environment(hospital)
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:36:53 +0100
Cc: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jordi Espasa Clofent <sistemes.llistes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:31:19 -0700
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hn6DcnW1h7qgLRv7d82UwwQB7jvN868UhwpP9FJl+5u7HMxOYE5hlLqZ6/oL77xW8lKshUmX0K3zkB+Lt3tbM7V3GpYEliHl5/i0NhqljIulEvr31b4ZUqYbzC6HDOmEBQOX9qvbs2f+Ge67yBucdmHoTdxWgqhE7sCh1R7lyvk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gs/xkhH5wacHa4qV/Cc8KQxxqgdvLcj930N/3/7XVG8XSoGv3KpFLD2vENt/2GG1IMZzw8K/vN5a6X4w2QL05U77rTb3p0Aa2dMSX8f820bhpt9ly9S/p744eoDEetN1ldL+q7JtRNe6LuiEGpJYOiJPXOWtSimirYy5zTOlCmk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070623131951.GA6011@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <467CFE8F.9010501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01166BD7@trantor> <20070623131951.GA6011@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
Ligesh wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:15:25PM +1000, James Harper wrote:
problems when virtualisation isn't involved, and the last thing you want
is one of the vendors throwing their hands in the air and saying
'Xen/VMWare'??? We don't support that!!!


 Why would you want to tell the application software folks that you are running 
it inside Xen? How can they even find out? Just let them login to the windows 
machine like they normally do, and even if they are experts on virtualization, 
I don't think there is an easy way to determine that. Even the windows os 
itself has no idea it is running in a virtualized environment. In fact, that's 
the entire point of virtualization--virtualize nothing or at the most, the 
kernel, and the apps all work transparently, since otherwise the entire thing 
becomes pointless.

 As for virtualization itself, you need to check the stability of Xen itself, 
which has only been tagged stable recently. Virtualization makes it easier to 
manage, and overall I would say increases the reliability, simply on account of 
being easier to keep track of, and also take backups, migrate in case of 
hardware failure etc.
Well, sending them a "sysreport" output might be a good hint, because it will name the Xen kernel. In fact, why would you want to lie about it? Not telling a vendor your actual setup is begging for them to suffer.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users