Re: [Xen-users] Recommended multi-server approach

[Tom Mornini <tmornini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It makes sense run *nothing* other than sshd in Dom0, IMHO.

--  
-- Tom Mornini, CTO
-- Engine Yard, Ruby on Rails Hosting
-- Support, Scalability, Reliability
-- (866) 518-YARD (9273)


On Jun 14, 2007, at 2:02 AM, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> My idea is build a server with one of the next approaches:
>
>
>  ---------------------
> | Dom0 (fw, dns, ntp) |
>  ---------------------
> | Dom1 (smtp)         |
>  ---------------------
> | Dom2 (http)         |
>  ---------------------
>
> or
>
>
>  ---------------------
> | Dom0                |
>  ---------------------
> | Dom1 (fw)           |
>  ---------------------
> | Dom2 (dns, ntp)     |
>  ---------------------
> | Dom3 (smtp)         |
>  ---------------------
> | Dom4 (http)         |
>  ---------------------
>
>
> My question is
>
> ¿Is recommended to create a separate VPS for the services I want to  
> build in Dom0 (firewall, dns and ntp) and left Dom0 for xen  
> management purposes? So... ¿what approach is recommended, the first  
> or the second? ¿Why?
> I have two NICs in the physical box, and my idea is use one of them  
> for the services (DMZ) and another one for management purposes only  
> (LAN).
> --
> Thanks,
> Jordi Espasa Clofent
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users