|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
[Xen-users] Xen 3.1 - 32 vs 64 bit hypervisor 
| I've been experimenting with Xen 3.1.
My requirements are to run lots 32 bit paravirt domains on large
memory hosts (8GB or more).
Previously I've used a 32 bit Xen with PAE hypervisor which works
well.  However I seen from the announcement that you can use a 64 bit
hypervisor and still run 32 bit PAE domains.  I've tried this and it
works as advertised!
What I'm wondering is, will it be best for me to run a 32 bit PAE Xen
hypervisor or a 64 bit hypervisor?  What is the tradeoff between the
two? Which is likely to be more efficient and which more stable?
Thanks
Nick
-- 
Nick Craig-Wood <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-users] Xen 3.1 - 32 vs 64 bit hypervisor,
Nick Craig-Wood <=
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |