|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] overhead of Xen when using iSCSI 
| 
Siim Vahtre wrote:
 The performance hit happens for me with local disk on Dom0 and with 
dedicated partitions for DomU use, and it's even worse with file images 
on Dom0. I haven't made or had the chance to use iscsi yet, since I only 
recently laid my hands on a GigE switch for my setup.
I have setup iSCSI targets (with open-iscsi) to dom0 (Xen 3.1), which 
are exported to paravirtualized guests: 
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/iscsi/test0,hda1,w' ]
Everything works fine, but there is huge overhead. If I write to iSCSI 
device in dom0 I get write speeds of about 29Mbytes/s, but if I write 
to /dev/hda1 in domU I only get about 14Mbytes/s. 
This kind of performance drop does not happen with regular disks or 
even NBD - they have some overhead but not 50% like I have with iSCSI. 
I have searched the list and I know that some people have successfully 
run setup similar to mine, so I'd like to ask if anyone could please 
share their experience and tell me if 50% performance drop is really 
normal. 
Thanks!
 
How did you test this? And do you have good guidelines on setting up 
iscsi? I'm finding fairly useless directions all over the place, but no 
good guides for RedHat/CentOS setups. 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |