|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Windows 2003 HVM Performance 
| 
 Hi
 
 could you use somthing else then ioemu? i
don't think so, i haven't see any paravirtualized driver yet... and i'm
also waiting for that (i've get the same problems but with an old Linux
2.4 Kernel and older Oracle db ;-) )
 
 gerhard
 
 PS: i hope this cross-posting will annoy
somebody
 
 
 
 
 
| Goga <narezatel@xxxxxxxxx> Sent by: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 18.12.2006 19:20
 | 
| To | "John McMonagle" <johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| cc | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| Subject | Re: [Xen-users] Windows 2003 HVM Performance |  
 
 |  
 
 Hello all.
 
 What disk I/O speed Windows guest should get?
 I runned benchmarks using Iometer at Windows server 2003 guest and got
 terrible results , about 4-6 Mb/sec ( btw , same for disks i connected
 using MS iscsi initiator and  SAMBA shares )
 It is normal speed for Windows guest  or something wrong in my installation?
 Guest and Iscsi target running on same machine .
 
 On 12/15/06, John McMonagle <johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
 >
 > >On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:55:38AM +0000, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
 > >
 > >
 > >>Hello all,
 > >>
 > >>I have recently been trying to install a windows 2003 server
on a Xen Dom0 with
 > >>an AMD X2 CPU.  I've not actually been able to finish
the installation due to
 > >>the Dom0 host crashing whilst the Windows installation is
"registering
 > >>components".  Hopefully the latest version of OpenSUSE
(which I'm downloading
 > >>at the moment) will fix that? :-)
 > >>
 > >>During the installation I noticed that the section of the
install that copied
 > >>files to the harddisc didn't execute very fast which prompted
me to google for
 > >>xen HVM harddisc performance figures.  I read some references
to a windows
 > >>paravirtualised harddisc driver that would improve performance.
 Does anyone
 > >>know whether paravirtualised drivers are in development?  I
also read that
 > >>network performance is near native so would it make sense
to install windows on
 > >>a partition on the Dom0 and then create a D drive on the windows
machine using
 > >>an iSCSI initiator?  This would mean that the domU would
be relying on it's
 > >>near native network performance for harddisc accesses.  Has
anyone tried this?
 > >>
 > >>I'd be interested to hear any advice on settings/tweaks to
improve windows HVM
 > >>performance.
 > >>
 > >>Many thanks in advance,
 > >>
 > >>
 > >>
 > >
 > >Windows paravirtualized device drivers for disk and network would
be a lot
 > >faster, but those are not publicly available :(
 > >
 > >They are part of Virtual Iron and Xen Enterprise products only..
:(
 > >
 > >-- Pasi
 > >
 > >
 > Anyone know if these drivers are in the Xen Express?
 >
 >
 >  John
 >
 > --
 > John McMonagle
 > IT Manager
 > Advocap Inc.
 >
 >
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Xen-users mailing list
 > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 >
 
 _______________________________________________
 Xen-users mailing list
 Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |