WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Where are Xen kernel patches?

To: "John McMonagle" <johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Where are Xen kernel patches?
From: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:56:32 +0100
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:00:04 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <458321A7.7050909@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccgmJWA5OWj5REaSZWpoQDu/6DZ+QB+dUkg
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Where are Xen kernel patches?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> John McMonagle
> Sent: 15 December 2006 22:29
> To: Petersson, Mats
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Where are Xen kernel patches?
> 
> Petersson, Mats wrote:
> 
> > 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >>[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> >>John McMonagle
> >>Sent: 15 December 2006 16:06
> >>To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: [Xen-users] Where are Xen kernel patches?
> >>
> >>Want to see if I can get a couple old servers running under Xen.
> >>
> >>They both need custom kernels.
> >>
> >>One needs to run sco executables and need the abi patches.
> >>The other is for win4lin and needs win4lin patches.
> >>
> >>Where are the xen kernel patches?
> >>Are there patches for older kernels that work with the current xen?
> >>It's improbably I will find  abi or win4lin patches for a 
> >>recent kernel.
> >>For win4lin see one for 2.6.14.3 for abi see mention of one 
> >>for 2.6.16.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Note: I haven't tried this, I'm just writing down what I have figured
> >out by looking at the different makefiles and doing other 
> things in Xen.
> >
> >
> >You can generate your own patches with "make mkpatches" in 
> the Xen tree.
> >
> >
> >You'll need to set the "LINUX_VER" to 2.6.14.3 in
> >.../buildconfigs/mk.linux-2.6-xen
> >
> >And there's absolutely no guarantee that your patches will 
> apply to this
> >kernel version, as it's quite ancient... It may be a BETTER option to
> >try to forward port the win4lin/sco abi changes to the current Xen
> >kernel version - as the patches for the Linux kernel in my
> >.../patches/linux-2.6.16.29/ is around 7500 lines of patches. I doubt
> >the size of the sco/win4lin patches are that big (although I guess
> >win4lin may be quite big), so it's possibly easier to make 
> those work on
> >a later kernel version than taking Xen back several releases... 
> >
> >--
> >Mats
> >  
> >
> I installed from debian etch and do not seen anything like that.
> Will I need the source from here?
> http://xensource.com/download/dl_303tarballs.html
> 
> Looks there are some current abi patches but not win4lin.
> 
> Is there any commitment to maintain kernel compatibility at 
> least over a
> major version?

Well, that's unfortunately one of the things that XenSource is being
nagged about by the major distributors of Linux: Keep up with the latest
kernel rev. Every new release of Xen can realisticly be expected to
upgrade to one of the newer kernel releases - it may not be THE LATEST,
but something near the latest that is stable will be the new kernel
after a release - then that kernel is usually kept stable within that
"unstable" time between (say) 3.0.4 and 3.0.5. 


> New version of xen have been coming out pretty often and it could get
> challenging if I have custom kernels.

Yes, unfortunately, I don't think you will win against Novell, RedHat &
Co... :-(

> 
> This brings me back to HVM. Does linux have good disk and network
> performance using HVM?

Define "good" ... ;-)

For Linux, there's para-virtual drivers, so you should get similar
performance to a para-virtual kernel build. 
For Windows, you'll have to pay to get a commercial version of Xen with
Windows PV drivers, as no one has yet published any "free" version of
para-vritual drivers for Windows. 

--
Mats
> 
> Thanks
> 
> John
> 
> >>I suppose HVM could be used, but do not have anything that 
> supports it
> >>at the moment.
> >>If one did use HVM would one still have the disk and lan performance
> >>issues windows has?
> >>
> >>Thanks
> >>
> >>John
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> John McMonagle
> IT Manager
> Advocap Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>