 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Hardened Xen
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Hardened Xen |
| From: | Alexander Thiem <Alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:55:26 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:55:18 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Reply-to: | Alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
And another question...I did not found anything on a working kernel with grsecurity/pax and xen patches at the same time. So what about using a hardened kernel in the domU while using a normal kernel in dom0 - does this make any sense? The dom0 will only be used to operate the guests - and nothing more. Will this be only placebo security? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] xenconsole: How to get out?, Goetz Bock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] bt878 based dvr card vs. pci pass-thru, Sipos Ferenc |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] 64 or 32 bit dom0?, Alexander Thiem |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Hardened Xen, Brad Plant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
