WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] I/O performance.

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] I/O performance.
From: Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:18:20 -0500
Delivery-date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:19:20 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <44F0260B.5090109@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <44F0260B.5090109@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
On Saturday 26 August 2006 5:44 am, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> What performance penalty I should expect from the I/O under domU ?
> Does it matter to the I/O if the CPU has hardware virtualization ?

no, HVM capabilities let you run non-modified guests, but doesn't do a thing 
(yet) for paravirtualized guests.

IOW, if you can run something without HVM, having it won't make a difference.

-- 
Javier

Attachment: pgpkqufMJ66QQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users