|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] /lib/tls.disable vs. software requiring tls 
| 
Ernst Bachmann wrote:
 
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 20:11, you wrote:
 Thats because in the old thread library each thread got its own process ID, 
the kernel had only little support for threads, so it had to be done that 
way.
(With nptl, they still have an own PID, but its hidden from the userspace 
better)
Hi,
but what about tomcat ? I use jre (java binary) which is linked to tls
(thread local storage) :
ldd /opt/jre/bin/java
         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)
         libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7f34000)
         libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7f30000)
         libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7df9000)
         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f4b000)
when i start a tomcat instance in a xen domU, i get lot of processes
instead a single (but multi-threaded) process ?
 
Without xen, nptl provides a huge speed boost to threaded applications (esp 
Java), so you really should try to get a xen-compilant NPTL glibc running.
=> no speed loss from xen emulating TLS, but all the benefits from futexes, 
fast context switch between threads, ... 
So, moving /lib/tls away is just a quick workarround, installing a "fixed" 
glibc is a solution. 
/Ernst
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
Thanks for your answer Ernst,
Do you know where could i get a fixed glibc ? any project ?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |