Re: [Xen-users] Xen on SuSe 10

>>> "Nick Couchman" <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx> 2005/12/04 9:02 >>>
> First, the version of Xen packaged with SuSE 10.0 seems very
unstable.
You need more stable Xen packages.
See http://www.opensuse.org/Installing_Xen3
 
> Second, on the guest O/S, the interface presented seems to change
numbers.
> For example, the first time you boot the guest, it shows up as
interface eth0.
> The second time it increments to interface eth1, and so on,
Check out last block in "MAC addresses" of
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/SuseYastDomU

> The guest O/S has "eth0" (or eth1, or eth2, etc.), 
> "veth0" (which I assume stands for virtual ethernet 0) and 
> "vif1.0" (virtual interface 1.0 or 2.0, etc.).  I'm slightly confused
by 
> which interface to configure on the guest O/S.
Following may help you to understand.
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-09/msg00376.html


Regards,
Takekazu Okamoto
Novell Japan

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Example PCI hiding in dom0 and direct access in domU, Brian McEntire

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] gdb on 64bit systems, Kip Macy

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Xen on SuSe 10, Nick Couchman

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Xen on SuSe 10, Nick Couchman

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]