|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] default CPU for 2nd domain... 
| >  > The default CPU for the first domU is wrong for SMP machines. Dead wrong
>  > if there are only the two domains.  dom0 and the first domU end up on
>  > hyperthreads of the first CPU. At least under 2.0.5 ....
Default allocation is already smarter under 3.0-unstable.
>  > and I frankly 
>  > didn't realize that XEN doesn't seem to move domains between "CPUs".
>  > Once a domain has been assigned a "CPU" it is stuck there until/unless
>  > someone moves it with "xm pincpu"
Yep.
>  > You can have two busy dom's sharing one CPU and the other CPU
>  > effectively idle. I hope and believe this will be fixed under 3.0 ?
>
> Does anybody know for certain if 3.0 will have a more intelligent CPU
> balancing system?
It will; in addition to the improved default allocation already available 
Stephan has code that tries to move vCPUs around in order to optimise the 
performance of the machine.
Cheers,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |