| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] hostfs for xen?
Nils Toedtmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 19.05.2005, 05:37 -0400 schrieb John A. Sullivan
III:
I have a slightly unusual situation where I need to pass data from one
domain to another but, for security reasons, one of the domains will not
be on the network. I would like to pass the data via a shared disk
partition. I would like to know if what I have done is safe.
UML has a neat & simple solution for sharing filesystems between the
guests and the host (that's UML speak, read "between the domUs and
dom0"): hostfs. The host can assign a "hostfs-root-dir" to a guest; the
guest may then mount any subdir of that directly into its own filesystem
(like a bindmount). Read/write operations get mapped to a uid on the
host (that mapping comes naturally since a UML guest is nothing but a
process on the host owned by that uid). Hostfs is really cool in
situations where nfs would be overkill or considered a security risk (i
admit: i do not know if hostfs actually _is_ more secure than nfs, or -
if not - if it could be designed in a secure manner. It just appears to
be more secure due to its simplicity).
I don't know how UML does this but it seems like VMware embeds a version
of Samba for this purpose.
You could certainly use it to achieve the same goal.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Would such a thing be interesting for xen? Or would that be too evil? I
really missed hostfs when i switched from UML to xen.
/nils.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home