RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed chan

To:	"Sean Dague" <sean@xxxxxxxxx>, "Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:49:07 +0100
Cc:	xen-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:47:32 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcWXZWf8aaR6Bd7AQ22DhboSUJxIxgAC7rKQ
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes

 
> It isn't in xm info today.  It could be added, or given it's 
> own place. 
> Honestly, it might make sense to make all the sched commands 
> have a sched- prefix, mostly to make it clear to the user 
> what bvt really is.

Yep, having a sched- prefix is definitely helpful.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC] xm interface proposed changes, Sean Dague

Next by Date:

[Xen-tools] Tools Status, Ian Pratt

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes, Sean Dague

Next by Thread:

[Xen-tools] Tools Status, Ian Pratt

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-tools

RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes