> <mailto:
tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Presumably it was the "hat" part that they objected too?  So
>     choose something
>     that is as far from a hat as possible, but still cowboy themed:
>     "cowboyboot Linux"?
>
>     Only similarity with "redhat" is that both end in the letter "t"
>     ... the world will officially
>     be crazy if the lawyers deem that to be infringing :-)
>
>
> I agree, but as an individual I don't have a good way to defend myself
> against Red Hat and their team of lawyers.
>
>
>     How does version control in Fedora work?  If you heard a rumor
>     that fedora was building,
>     installing and booting on x86 on some particular day: could you
>     find out what versions
>     of each package they used and replicate the setup? Or is it just a
>     crapshoot and you
>     get the latest of everything, so you take your chances that it
>     wasn't broken between
>     it working on x86 and you starting your build?
>
>
> In theory this would be possible but very difficult.  Individual
> packages are versioned so if you knew what version of anaconda worked
> you could try that.  I honestly don't have the time to put quite that
> much effort into this.
>
> On another note.... you work for Intel right?  I had hear that Intel
> had been looking into hosting the koji server so we could have a
> _real_ Fedora ia64 again.  Do you know anything about that?
>
>
> Dave
>
>