Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18633, Linux#701, ioemu#629adb3f... Status --- no new issue

[Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:28:37PM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
> Hi all,
>     There is no new regression found in Cset#18633.
> 
>     Two old issue were fixed in remote-ioemu by KUWAMURA:
>     [FIXED] 1. With 4096M, VTI can not boot up emulated rtl8139 network-card
>     [FIXED] 2. With 4095M, qemu of VTI guest will disappear when booting
> 
>     I also found one old issue (low priority) was also fixed now. The VTI 
> with special memory 3073M can be booted. KUWAMURA, Is this fixing related to 
> your patch?

I believe that 131:9210bd27a551 of efi-vfirmware.hg fixed it.
I had tested only 3037MB, 3098MB cases, though.

thanks,

>     Issue information is: [IPF] VTI will crash while booting with 3073M memory
> 
>     It is told by Akio Takebe that Kuwamura had checked the memory area that 
> we cannot boot hvm a guest from 3073MB to 3299MB. Results are below:
>    FAIL: 3073-3077, 3079-3094, 3098MB
>    PASS: 3078, 3095-3097, 3099-3299MB
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-07/msg00200.html
> 
> 
> Detail Xen/IA64 Unstable Cset #18633 Status Report
> ============================================================
> Test Result Summary:
>         # total case:   17
>         # passed case: 17
>         # failed case:   0
> ============================================================
> Testing Environment:
>         platform: Tiger4
>         xen ia64 unstable tree: 18633
>         dom0 Cset:                    701
>         ioemu commit: 629adb3f5244169731ff18b16ae919641d81ad76
>         processor: Itanium 2 Processor
>         logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Dual Core)
>         pal version: 9.68
>         service os: RHEL5u2 IA64 SMP with 2 VCPUs
>         vti guest os: RHEL5u2 & RHEL4u3
>         xenU guest os: RHEL4u4
>         xen schedule: credit
>         gfw: open guest firmware Cset#131
> ============================================================
> Detailed Test Results:
> 
> Passed case Summary                     Description
>         Two_UP_VTI_Co           UP_VTI (mem=256)
>         One_UP_VTI                         1 UP_VTI (mem=256)
>         One_UP_XenU                     1 UP_xenU(mem=256)
>         One_SMPVTI_4096M                1 VTI (vcpus=2, mem=4096M)
>         SMPVTI_LTP                      VTI (vcpus=4, mem=512) run LTP
>         Save&Restore                    Save&Restore
>         VTI_Live-migration                      Linux VTI live-migration
>         SMPVTI_and_SMPXenU      1 VTI + 1 xenU (mem=256 vcpus=2)
>         Two_SMPXenU_Coexist     2 xenU (mem=256, vcpus=2)
>         SMPVTI_Network                  1 VTI (mem=256,vcpu=2) and'ping'
>         SMPXenU_Network         1 XenU (vcpus=2) and 'ping'
>         One_SMP_XenU                    1 SMP xenU (vcpus=2)
>         One_SMP_VTI                     1 SMP VTI (vcpus=2)
>         SMPVTI_Kernel_Build             VTI (vcpus=4) and do KernelBuild
>         UPVTI_Kernel_Build              1 UP VTI and do kernel build
>         SMPVTI_Windows                  SMPVTI windows(vcpu=2)
>         SMPWin_SMPVTI_SMPxenU   SMPVTI Linux/Windows & XenU
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Zhang Jingke
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 

-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel