|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Re-post it to warmup discussion in case people can't read PPT format,
IVT is very performance sensitive for the native Linux, how about dual
IVT tables alternative for CPU virtualization? It would need
maintainance effort but it would be much cleaner forIA64 situation.
-Fred
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives,
Yang, Fred <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
|
|
|
|
|