|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?
Hi Kayvan
Thanks for your work and sharing.
Can you repost the performance data for native/domU by using the same
format as this one?
That would be more clear.
Thanks,
Anthony
Kayvan Sylvan wrote:
> The overhead was calculated by taking the jobs/minute from the
> RE-AIM7 benchmark for the HVM guest and comparing it against the same
> measure when running on the native machine.
>
> Environment Forks Jobs/min
> --------------------------------
> native 2-cpu 31 4009.9
> xen HVM 2-cpu 31 3558.7
>
> native 4-cpu 133 8009.4
> xen HVM 4-cpu 51 6854.3
>
> native 8-cpu 81 15898.3
> xen HVM 8-cpu 81 12462.5
>
> native 16-cpu 157 30840.2
> xen HVM 16-cpu 41 11308.0
>
> If there is some better benchmark or measure that I can use, I would
> be happy to do it.
>
> I'm working on creating equivalent environments on a Montvale machine
> and on x86_64 for comparisons.
>
> ---Kayvan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:06 PM
> To: Kayvan Sylvan; Alex Williamson
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?
>
> Hi, Kayvan
>
>> For the Montecito chip, running the RE-AIM7 compute workload, we
>> have the following preliminary summary:
>>
>> Native vs. Xen performace
>> ----------------------------------
>> At 2-CPU, the overhead was 13%.
>> At 4-CPU, the overhead was 17%
>> At 8-cpu, overhead was 28%
>> At 16-cpu, the overhead was 173%
> Interesting. But what does "overhaed was 173%" mean?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Akio Takebe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Akio Takebe
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?,
Xu, Anthony <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Kayvan Sylvan
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Joseph Szczypek
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Tristan Gingold
|
|
|
|
|