Hi, Horms
>On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:29:53AM +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
>> Hi, Alex, Horms
>>
>> Sorry for my late responce.
>> >> What do you think about it?
>> >
>> > The panic does seem a bit much, but shouldn't we return rather than
>> >continue on with a NULL_VECTOR? Thanks,
>> Yes, I also thik so.
>> I'll post the new patch.
>>
>> I'm yet debugging kexec/kdump on HVM.
>> I have a question, could you give me advice, Horms?
>> kexec-tool set the new start address to jump there through
>> relocate_new_kernel.
>> Which function do the new start address point?
>
>Hi Takebe-san,
>
>After relocate_new_kernel the code should jump into purgatory. Or more
>specifically, purgatory_start() which is in purgatory/arch/ia64/entry.S
>in the kexec-tools source tree. Once it has finished in there it should
>end up calling _start() of the second/crash kernel.
>
>If the EFI code is not mapped at 0xf/0xc and you have not
>patched kexec-tools, then the code may well get stuck in
>purgatory because of the hardcoded PAGE_OFFSET which is
>used in PA() inside purgatory/arch/ia64/purgatory-ia64.c
>
>I have serveral work-arounds for this problem, so let me know
>if you think that this is where you are getting stuck.
>
It is very helpful. I'll read the codes.
Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home