Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Introduce xen specific gate pa

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:25:47AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>    This looks like a good idea, a few questions:
> 
>       * Is there still a need to keep the CONFIG_XEN_IA64_VDSO_PARAVIRT
>         sub config option?  Would we actually support this not set, or
>         should we merge it into CONFIG_XEN?
>       * If I understand correctly, instead of creating a single, dynamic
>         bare metal/paravirt gate page, this is creating two static pages
>         and the appropriate one is installed once at boot.  Is the other
>         one freed?
>       * The calculated padding using the .skip looks like a bit of a
>         maintenance issue (not that these files change often), could it
>         be calculated at build time?

Thank you for comments. All of them are addressed.
I attached the updated one.


>       * Does this simplify any aspect of the paravirt_alt proposal?  I
>         don't think so, but I'd like to know your plans for that as
>         well.

No.

-- 
yamahata

164_9d4bcd10abcb_xen_specific_gate_page.patch
Description: Text Data

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Use saner dom0 memory and vcpu defaults, don't panic on over-allocation, Alex Williamson

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Use saner dom0 memory and vcpu defaults, don't panic on over-allocation, Isaku Yamahata

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Introduce xen specific gate page., Alex Williamson

Next by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] set rr0 to rr4 hyperprivop, Isaku Yamahata

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]