| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH] "Controller" pcibacken
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 20:13 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 10/6/07 19:24, "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I would like to see this backend become the default backend for ia64,
> > but it probably needs testing on other systems before we can make the
> > switch. I would appreciate testing and/or review feedback. To make use
> > of extended I/O port spaces, you'll need the patch I sent to
> > xen-ia64-devel last week to register the I/O port spaces with Xen.
Hi Keir,
Thanks for looking at the patch.
> It would be nice to have just one backend type, with relevant bits of its
> code made arch-specific. I'm sure x86 doesn't need vpci, passthru *and*
> slot.
I agree, but I wasn't ready to tackle that problem.
> This is probably fine for now; it doesn't preclude merging or dropping other
> backends down the line. Only thing I spotted is that you make an enormous
> inline function in pcifront.h. That function will have to be moved elsewhere
> into a .c file if it's getting that big.
Right, I forgot about that. It is rather unwieldy for a static
inline. I guess pcifront/pci_op.c is the most appropriate place for it.
I'll tuck it in a #ifdef there unless you have a better suggestion.
Thanks,
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home