Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] Xen machine vector

On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 17:54 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> Hi Alex.
> 
> Machine vector means that dma api is accessed indirectory.
> Potentially it might be possible to replace dma api
> implementation dynamically with xen-paravirtualized one
> on unmodified (non-xen) Linux kernel of CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC=y.
> Then pci front could be used for VTi domain with paravirtualized
> device driver module.
> 
> Does it sound useful?

Hi Isaku,

   So you're suggesting we have a Xen machine vector for a generic
kernel, not compiled with CONFIG_XEN?  As long as the Xen aware code is
confined within that specific machine vector, I think that sounds like a
good idea.  Interesting possibilities there.  Thanks,

        Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] Xen machine vector, Alex Williamson Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] Xen machine vector, Alex Williamson Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] Xen machine vector, Isaku Yamahata Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] Xen machine vector, Isaku Yamahata Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] Xen machine vector, Alex Williamson <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] cleanup warning of UC|WB attribute page, Akio Takebe

Next by Date:

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH] optimization for windows, Alex Williamson

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] Xen machine vector, Isaku Yamahata

Next by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH: declaration of all regs in vcpu_guest_context_regs, Alex Williamson

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]