 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH]mini-os: big-endian mini-os
| To: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH]mini-os: big-endian mini-os on ia64 |
| From: | Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:25:13 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:24:16 -0800 |
| Domainkey-signature: | s=s768; d=fujitsu-siemens.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=PUbgtqGK+Gass8I3b3WbXZKWLcUs8v0E64WoaS/04yYy6TADiFVIwtFmRV097B4IaeeUPRqbZkZZZ6VaDPnCdJ1LbmHTteZxu7QZOhD4tNSlMM66IYA/YqJDPVuCCq5Y; |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C209BDCA.A355%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <C209BDCA.A355%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.5 |
Am Dienstag, 27. Februar 2007 11:51 schrieb Keir Fraser: > I don;t think we'd have a problem with incorportaing support for ia64-be if > there's a good reason for it (a better reason than "because it's > possible"). I understand this. > > The other way would be building wrappers around all the accesses to > > domU/hypervisor interfaces and hide the SWAPs there. But this seems a > > little bit overkill at this stage. > > It would be less ugly and I think less prone to missing some open-coded > accesses. Open-coding the SWAP()s is pretty grim. Yes I see this. It's simply more work and more code is touched but from the design view it's a lot better. If this is OK for you, I will try this and send a new patch as a proposal. Thanks. Dietmar. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel |
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH]mini-os: big-endian mini-os on ia64, Dietmar Hahn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH]mini-os: big-endian mini-os on ia64, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH]mini-os: big-endian mini-os on ia64, Dietmar Hahn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH]mini-os: big-endian mini-os on ia64, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
