WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Follow new interrupt deliver mechanism for

To: Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Follow new interrupt deliver mechanism for PV-on-HVM/IPF
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:58:22 -0700
Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:58:12 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200612192329.kBJNTwX25877@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: OSLO R&D
References: <4587C678.2050902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><1166553364.5708.1.camel@lappy> <200612192329.kBJNTwX25877@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 08:29 +0900, Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
>   Thank you for your comment.
> 
> You (alex.williamson) said:
> >> +  return rid | (1 << 31); /* with RID marker(MSB) */
> > 
> >    Ok, except (1 << 31) needs to be defined in a common header somewhere
> > so it's not just a random magic bit.  Thanks,
> 
>   I agree it.
> 
>   I think that the definition should be in xen/include/public/hvm/params.h
> or xen/include/public/arch-ia64.h.
> 
>   What do you think about this ?

   It's ia64 specific, so arch-ia64.h seems more appropriate.  Just an
FYI, I think we're close enough to when Keir wants to make a final 3.0.4
release that I don't plan to request another pull of the xen-ia64 tree
unless it's absolutely necessary.  If you think this is necessary for
3.0.4, please provide justification.  Thanks,

        Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel