xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq
On 22/11/06 08:16, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> To clarify, by event/main loop I mean: Flush just before qemu blocks
>> (otherwise multicall can be held for unbounded time, unless we set a
>> batching timeout which hopefully we can avoid needing to do).
>
> Seems good,
>
> Is it possible that we add some file descriptors for some interrupts in qemu
> block (select)?
> Then if there are any interrupts, qemu will be woke up.
> In this case, we can only call multi-call just after qemu block.
I'm not sure what you mean.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- Re: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-devel][RFC]degradation on IPF due to hypercall set irq, Xu, Anthony
|
|
|