Hi, Wing
I'm sorry.
Our patch modify codes of hypervisor and dom0 kernel.
So after installing xen.gz and dom0 kernel, please reboot system with them.
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
>Oh, I forgot restart xend last time.
>But this time I get another error info. See attachment
>
>Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
>-Wing(zhang xin)
>
>OTC,Intel Corporation
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年11月7日 14:55
>To: Zhang, Xing Z; Masaki Kanno; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Akio Takebe
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
>
>Hi, Wing
>
>Could you try it again after "xend stop; xend start".
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Akio Takebe
>
>>New GFW will release soon, I think it's today.
>>I used your merge.patch but failed. Seems some problems in python code.
>>Attachment is a picture show the issue
>>
>>Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
>>-Wing(zhang xin)
>>
>>OTC,Intel Corporation
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2006年11月7日 13:39
>>To: Zhang, Xing Z; Masaki Kanno; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
>>
>>Hi, Wing
>>
>>I don't know, but if you give me newer GFW,
>>we'll test "xm os-init" on windows of domVTi.
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>
>>Akio Takebe
>>
>>>I still have a question:
>>> How windows OS_INIT handler do? How can I confirm whether PAL_INIT executed
>>> successful in windows? ( in Linux , I can see a lot of dump info on
>>> screen)
>>>
>>>Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
>>>-Wing(zhang xin)
>>>
>>>OTC,Intel Corporation
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Masaki Kanno [mailto:kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>Sent: 2006ト・1ヤツ6ネユ 18:18
>>>To: Zhang, Xing Z; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
>>>
>>>Hi Zhang,
>>>
>>>We were looking forward to your patches.
>>>We have a question and a comment.
>>>
>>>Question:
>>> How can we inject the INIT interrupt into domVTi?
>>> We made xm os-init command, and tested your patch.
>>> But INIT handler of domVTi was not executed, we think.
>>> We attach two files.
>>> - merge.patch : It is a patch that we tested.
>>> - xenctx.log : It is a cpu-context of domVTi after we test.
>>>
>>>Comment:
>>> We think that TODO line is unnecessary.
>>>
>>>@@ -404,7 +419,7 @@ static void deliver_ipi (VCPU *vcpu, uin
>>> break;
>>> case 5: // INIT
>>> // TODO -- inject guest INIT <---------- This!
>>>- panic_domain (NULL, "Inject guest INIT!\n");
>>>+ vmx_inject_guest_pal_init(vcpu);
>>> break;
>>> case 7: // ExtINT
>>> vmx_vcpu_pend_interrupt (vcpu, 0);
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>> Kan and Akio
>>>
>>>>This patch add guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Signed-off-by, Zhang Xin < xing.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
>>>>
>>>>-Wing(zhang xin)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>OTC,Intel Corporation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-------------------------------text/plain-------------------------------
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>>>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|