Re: [Xen-devel] PATH: start_pfn field in xen_domctl_getmemlist_t

Le Mardi 29 Août 2006 18:20, Hollis Blanchard a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 12:00 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > Because getmemlist needs to be restartable and read P2M, xen/ia64 has
> > always passed start_pfn info trough the hypercall.
>
> By "restartable" you mean create a continuation?
No.
getmemlist may fail during copy to guest, because of missing TLB entries.  We 
manually restart the call.

> Why does getmemlist
> need to be restartable only on IA64? Also, where does the IA64 code
> create a continuation for it now?
See xc_ia64_get_pfn_list in tools/libxc/ia64/xc_ia64_stubs.c

Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] PATH: start_pfn field in xen_domctl_getmemlist_t, Tristan Gingold Re: [Xen-devel] PATH: start_pfn field in xen_domctl_getmemlist_t, Hollis Blanchard Re: [Xen-devel] PATH: start_pfn field in xen_domctl_getmemlist_t, Tristan Gingold <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] PV-on-HVM for IPF (take 3), DOI Tsunehisa

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: xencomm for xen/ia64, Tristan Gingold

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] PATH: start_pfn field in xen_domctl_getmemlist_t, Hollis Blanchard

Next by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] PV-on-HVM for IPF (take 3), DOI Tsunehisa

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]