xen-ia64-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM

from [Doi . Tsunehisa]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM
From:	Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:14:28 +0900
Cc:	xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:14:49 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	Your message of Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:27:31 -0600. <1155932851.5540.9.camel@lappy>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<44E5B66B.1040002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><1155932851.5540.9.camel@lappy>
Sender:	xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

You (alex.williamson) said:
> On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 21:45 +0900, DOI Tsunehisa wrote:
>>   We want to catch up this common feature. We don't complete to catch
>> up, yet. But I'll post patches which we wrote already.
>> 
>>   This patch includes:
>> 
>>   * catch up `hvm_op fixup'
>>     - This patch modifies HYPERVISOR_hvm_op().
>>   * catch up `hvm_inter'
>>     - This patch adds support for sending event channel interrupts
>>       to VT-i guests.
>>   * catch up `hvm_op_hypercall'
>>     - This patch includes HYPERVISOR_hvm_op() stabs for linux.
>> 
>>   We'll catch up other features, as soon as possible.
> 
>    Are these for the current xen-ia64-unstable.hg tree, or do we need to
> merge with xen-unstable.hg first to pull more of the changes you listed?

  For the current xen-ia64-unstable.hg tree. These patches are not effected
curretly, because it is not used, except PV-on-HVM.

Thanks,
- Tsunehisa Doi

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM, DOI Tsunehisa Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM, Alex Williamson Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM, Doi . Tsunehisa <= Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM, Alex Williamson

Previous by Date:	[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Remove PIN processing for Domain-0 vcpu0, Masaki Kanno
Next by Date:	[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11048, You, Yongkang
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM, Alex Williamson
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Catch up for PV_on_HVM, Alex Williamson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]