WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [BUGREPORT] Panic dom0 by using module netbk.ko

To: Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [BUGREPORT] Panic dom0 by using module netbk.ko
From: Al Stone <ahs3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:35:08 -0600
Cc: fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:35:25 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A3C6BA01C5E506takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard
References: <A3C6BA01C5E506takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: ahs3@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:13 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
> I found a bug of xen-ia64-unstable.
> In the case of CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_BACKEND=m,
> when I modprobe xennet.ko on domainU, dom0 panic.
> This issue is occured in netbk.ko on dom0.
> netbk is modularized in FC6, so I found the bug.
> But this issue is also occured with xen-ia64-unstable.
> I tried this issue on x86_64, but it is not occured.
> 
> I'd like to share this issue status for working on FC6/IPF.
> So I report it.

This is a question to the list in general, as much as
it is a response to this bug report: would it not make
more sense to start filing bug reports using the bugzilla 
site already set up [1]?  I do appreciate seeing these 
reports here -- even if I'm not sure what is causing the
problem -- but I tend to loose them in my mailbox after 
a while.  If nothing else, regular use of bugzilla will
allow us to get a better feel for the quality of the ia64
work (which is, of course, awesome :).

Domo arigato for the report, Akio-san.  But I do not know
what is causing the problem :(...


References:
[1] http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/index.cgi

-- 
Ciao,
al
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Stone                                      Alter Ego:
Open Source and Linux R&D                     Debian Developer
Hewlett-Packard Company                       http://www.debian.org
E-mail: ahs3@xxxxxxxxx                        ahs3@xxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel