WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_set_tr_entry: which pte is correct ?

To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_set_tr_entry: which pte is correct ?
From: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:11:19 +0200
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:07:21 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
Hi,

I have a question about vcpu_set_tr_entry usage.

vcpu_itr_d/vcpu_itr_i calls it with the metaphysical pte, which IMHO is 
correct.

However, vcpu_itc_no_srlz (thus vcpu_itc_d/vcpu_itc_i) calls it with the 
machine pte, which IMHO is incorrect.

Comments ?

Tristan.



_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_set_tr_entry: which pte is correct ?, Tristan Gingold <=