WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] emulate ldfp8 in mmio

To: "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] emulate ldfp8 in mmio
From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:17:07 +0800
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:17:49 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZpDxM2shYpchfITjuvEuzxJs+1QAAAxJaA
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] emulate ldfp8 in mmio
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年4月26日 16:59
>To: Xu, Anthony; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] emulate ldfp8 in mmio
>
>Le Mercredi 26 Avril 2006 10:39, Xu, Anthony a écrit :
>> From: Tristan Gingold
>>
>> >Sent: 2006年4月26日 16:32
>> >To: Xu, Anthony; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] emulate ldfp8 in mmio
>> >
>> >Le Mardi 25 Avril 2006 07:30, Xu, Anthony a écrit :
>> >> 1. emulate ldpf8 in mmio
>> >> 2. handle floating point register rotation in functions setfpreg and
>> >> getfpreg
>> >
>> >Just a late comment:
>> >
>> >writes to f0/f1 are not correctly handled.  A fault must be reflected to
>> > user.
>>
>> From intuition, it's a bug,
>>
>> After studying ldfp instruction further, this maybe not a bug,
>> Before reading memory, processor will check target fp register, if the
>> target fp register is f0 or f1, a fault happens.
>Good point.
>
>So we could remove case 0 and case 1 in setfpreg because this generates a
>warning.
Sure


>Tristan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>