RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb

["Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>]

>From: Alex Williamson
>Sent: 2006?4?11? 8:29
>To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>Cc: Xu, Anthony; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb
>
>On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 16:20 -0700, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
>Collins) wrote:
>
>> FYI, I did a preliminary test and found that "time" and
>> "date +%s" are yielding essentially the same result for dom0,
>> even with dom0 also doing Linux builds.  So ignore that
>> question.
>
>   Good to know, thanks for verifying.
>
>> However, I did see widely varying time results for domU,
>> varying in some cases by more than 10% (yes, I ignored
>> the builds that ended with "gcc segmentation fault" and
>> the first build). Are others seeing a wide variance also?
>
>   I only ran the build twice for each test case and my two results
>appear to be w/in 1% of each other for the domU builds.  Dom0 seems to
>have even better consistency.
>
I confirm this; I had run kernel build on Dom0 more than 10 times.
The result is very consistent.

Thanks,
Anthony

>       Alex
>
>--
>Alex Williamson                             HP Linux & Open Source Lab

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel