RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SAL INFO virtualization

To:	"Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SAL INFO virtualization
From:	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:00:03 +0800
Delivery-date:	Mon, 03 Apr 2006 03:00:58 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcZW7OS7i6T2NrXMSOOcInzmys000gABrI5A
Thread-topic:	[Xen-ia64-devel] SAL INFO virtualization

>From: Tristan Gingold
>Sent: 2006年4月3日 15:09
>Here are 3 propositions:
>
>1) Only dom0 has access to error records.  Therefore, dom0 should run
>on every
>CPUs.

Just an unrelated comment, Dom0 should always run on every physical 
processor, which is the base requirement for performance reason. It's not 
"therefore" result of this specific issue and instead you can take it as the 
basic assumption for your thought. :-)

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SAL INFO virtualization