WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Event channel vs current scheme speed [wasvIOSAPIC

To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Event channel vs current scheme speed [wasvIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery]
From: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:31:53 +0100
Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:28:51 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD8094E7903@pdsmsx403>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD8094E7903@pdsmsx403>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
Le Jeudi 09 Mars 2006 21:02, Tian, Kevin a écrit :
> Anyway, good discussion by far though still some way to go for
> consensus. :-)
>
> Maybe we want to look at this from another way - fairness.
[...]
> Regarding current model, there seems to be an issue about fairness
> between physical interrupts and "xen events". Taking current 0xE9 for
> example, it's lower than timer but higher than all external device
> interrupts. This means "xen events" will always preempt device interrupts
> in this case, which is unfair and not what we want.
To my understanding, this is also true for x86.
With event channel, real physical IRQs use events 0-255, while Xen events use 
events 256-511.

So what is the difference ?

Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel