Hi Fujita,
After do some investigation with Xiantao, the two failed cases are because we
used out of date LTP. :(
The LTP which we used is okay for 2.6.12. But the latest kernel has some change
in af_inet.c. And the error number is also changed.
I have checked the latest LTP. 20060306. Its source also has the update:
--- old/socket01.c 2006-03-13 15:44:43.000000000 +0800
+++ new/socket01.c 2006-03-13 15:44:08.000000000 +0800
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@
}
if (TEST_RETURN != tdat[testno].retval ||
(TEST_RETURN < 0 &&
- TEST_ERRNO != tdat[testno].experrno)) {
- tst_resm(TFAIL, "%s ; returned"
- " %d (expected %d), errno %d (expected"
+ (TEST_ERRNO != tdat[testno].experrno && TEST_ERRNO != EPROTONOSUPPORT))) {
/* Change for defect 21065 for kernel change */
+ tst_resm(TFAIL, "%s ; returned" /* of return code for this test but don't
want */
+ " %d (expected %d), errno %d (expected" /* to break on older kernels */
" %d)", tdat[testno].desc,
s, tdat[testno].retval,
TEST_ERRNO, tdat[testno].experrno);
So I suggest we all upgrade the LTP to latest one 20060305 to fix for the
2.6.16 kernel. :)
Best Regards,
Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of You,
>Yongkang
>Sent: 2006年3月13日 9:36
>To: yo.fujita; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>
>Hi Fujita,
>
>Thanks for your detail information. I also got the same result like yours. But
>I
>made a mistake that I said it might relate to xenU unusable network. I forgot
>it
>was running in Xen0. :) Xen0 network should be okay.
>
>There should be some problems, for my LTP result on Native (pure RHEL4u2
>with Tiger2) show these 2 cases are both pass.
>
>Best Regards,
>Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2006年3月13日 9:24
>>To: You, Yongkang; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>
>>Hi YongKang,
>>
>>> EM～ From the log, there are only 4 failed cases. Two are known float
>>issue.
>>> The other 2 names are related to socket, it may related no network in
>>XenU.
>>I think so.
>>
>>This is detailed result of socket01.
>>socket01 1 PASS : invalid domain successful
>>socket01 2 PASS : invalid type successful
>>socket01 3 PASS : UNIX domain dgram successful
>>socket01 4 FAIL : raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected -1),
>>errno 93 (expected 94)
>>socket01 5 PASS : UDP socket successful
>>socket01 6 FAIL : UDP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>socket01 7 FAIL : TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>socket01 8 PASS : TCP socket successful
>>socket01 9 FAIL : ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>
>>Similarly, it's socketpair01.
>>socketpair01 1 PASS : invalid domain successful
>>socketpair01 2 PASS : invalid type successful
>>socketpair01 3 PASS : UNIX domain dgram successful
>>socketpair01 4 FAIL : raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected
>>-1), errno 93 (expected 94)
>>socketpair01 5 PASS : bad pointer successful
>>socketpair01 6 PASS : bad pointer successful
>>socketpair01 7 PASS : UDP socket successful
>>socketpair01 8 FAIL : TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>socketpair01 9 PASS : TCP socket successful
>>socketpair01 10 FAIL : ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno
>>93 (expected 94)
>>
>>Does your result match to this?
>>It might be due to the environment if differing.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Fujita
>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of nakato
>>> >Sent: 2006年3月10日 19:51
>>> >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>> >
>>> >Hi.
>>> >I'm Watanabe, co-worker of Fujita.
>>> >He's going out now for his unavoidable reason,
>>> >so I'll send the report instead today.
>>> >
>>> >TEST RESULT
>>> > 5/816 FAIL (Please see the attached files)
>>> >
>>> >Thanks.
>>> >Watanabe Takehiko
>>> >
>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------
>>> >> Hi YongKang,
>>> >>
>>> >> No, I doesn't try LTP on dom0 yet.
>>> >> I will execute it now.
>>> >> I will inform the result later.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Fujita
>>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>>> >> > From: You, Yongkang [mailto:yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx]
>>> >> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:06 PM
>>> >> > To: yo.fujita; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi Fujita,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Did you try to run LTP and get the results in xen0 environment?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>> >> > Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>>> >> >
>>> >> > >-----Original Message-----
>>> >> > >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> > >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>> >> yo.fujita
>>> >> > >Sent: 2006年3月10日 14:32
>>> >> > >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> > >Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >Hi, all
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >I will inform this week's benchmark result.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >The tool used now is as follows.
>>> >> > > - unixbench4.1.0
>>> >> > > - bonnie++-1.03
>>> >> > > - ltp-full-20051205
>>> >> > > - iozone3_191
>>> >> > > - lmbench-3.0-a5
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >TEST ENVIRONMENT
>>> >> > > Machine : Tiger4
>>> >> > > KERN : 2.6.16-rc5-xenU
>>> >> > > changeset : 9157:a693ccb4d581
>>> >> > > Dom0 OS : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP)
>>> >> > > DomU OS : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP)
>>> >> > > No. of DomU's : 1
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >SUMMARY:
>>> >> > > - DomU came to do boot successfully!
>>> >> > >issues:
>>> >> > > -
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >TEST RESULT
>>> >> > > unixbench4.1.0 : PASS
>>> >> > > bonnie++-1.03 : PASS
>>> >> > > ltp-full-20051205 : 51/816 FAIL (Please see the attached files)
>>> >> > > iozone3_191 : PASS
>>> >> > > lmbench-3.0-a5 : PASS
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >Thanks and best regards,
>>> >> > >Fujita and Fujitsu members
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>> >> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home