|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc
Tristan:
This is a known issue and I ever disucssed time virtualization
with Dan for a while.
I prefer #1. That let domU see its ITC start from 0 at boot
time? And further more, we need to support Windows eventually.
In the meantime, I think both #1 and #3 should co-exist. Yes,
isn't the host ITC pre-synchronized in Xen?
Eddie.
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 08:32 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> during boot, linux kernel tries to synchronize itc of all
>> processors. However currently itc is not virtualized:
>> (XEN) vcpu_set_itc: Setting ar.itc is currently disabled
>>
>> What should we do ?
>> a) virtualize ITC
>> b) para-virtualize ITC (ie, modifying linux kernel)
>> c) pre-synchronize ITC
>>
>> I really prefer c).
>
> I'm not sure I understand c). Aren't the ITCs already
> pre-synchronized by xen in smp_callin()? Thanks,
>
> Alex
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc, Tristan Gingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc,
Dong, Eddie <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc, Luck, Tony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] SMP guest and itc, Dong, Eddie
|
|
|
|
|